Been here? Tap the star.
Leave a comment
🔗 Tue, 19 Aug 2008 — @ptomblin at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
But the two records also list different owners. I suppose the only way this is going to be settled is for somebody to phone both owners.
🔗 Tue, 19 Aug 2008 — @david at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
I think that's why the FAA hasn't spotted the duplication. From the sat view, it's clear that they're the same airport, with the runway described differently -- there's not room for a second strip on the same island.
🔗 Mon, 18 Aug 2008 — @ptomblin at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
Oh, and the two records have different runways, one is 16/34 1500x75 and the other is "NW/SE" 1500x100.
🔗 Mon, 18 Aug 2008 — @david at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
The FAA has a duplicate entry in their database, listing this airport as both WA58 and WA93.
Log in to leave a comment
Latest comments
re: FAA duplicate
🔗 Tue, 19 Aug 2008
— @ptomblin at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
But the two records also list different owners. I suppose the only way this is going to be settled is for somebody to phone both owners.
re: FAA duplicate
🔗 Tue, 19 Aug 2008
— @david at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
I think that's why the FAA hasn't spotted the duplication. From the sat view, it's clear that they're the same airport, with the runway described differently -- there's not room for a second strip on the same island.
re: FAA duplicate
🔗 Mon, 18 Aug 2008
— @ptomblin at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
Oh, and the two records have different runways, one is 16/34 1500x75 and the other is "NW/SE" 1500x100.
FAA duplicate
🔗 Mon, 18 Aug 2008
— @david at Eliza Island Airport, United States Reply
The FAA has a duplicate entry in their database, listing this airport as both WA58 and WA93.