Canada airport problem reports

There is no airport here

Please remove this airport, since it's a duplicate of CYYZ (Toronto international).

Airport new name "Grand River Executive". See up to date info in the Canada Flight Supplement.

Good day. Every single airport in Canada, uses MAGNETIC not TRUE headings, you are incorrectly reporting every single runway at every single airport in Canada. I have copies of NAV Canada's publications of the runway at CYYT, I can forward them when I receive the response email.

Runway 10/28 for example at my airport CYYT (102°/282° MAG as per the legal published areodrome charts) is being shown as 086°/266° TRUE. I use to use the METAR/TAF decoder website/app that is using your information to help me see what way the winds were blowing across the runway at the start of my shift so I could get a heads up to plan how I was plowing the runway with the winds. But due to the incorrect reporting of the runway, the winds will show it straight down the runway, when we have a cross wind for example.

Plan to reject this report. Impractical to add magnetic headings which are fleeting. Runway indicators are changed when official changes are made.

Not a Belleville problem, but the latest Google Chrome reports this site as dangerous and at risk for malicious hackers to exploit users because it is on "http" and not "https" which I believe is encrypted.

Removed from the current Transport Canada Flight Supplement (CFS)

Airfield has been closed.

Keywords: SB4, (Either no comma or additional information required after the comma)

The METAR you report is from an airport 220 km away. Nav Canada has an aviation weather system on site which is publicly reported. Historical you reported correctly, this is a recent change. I am Operations Manager for this aerodrome.

I can be contacted at Jason.surette@pc.gc.ca

Navaids: Incorrect information in column latitude_deg, column longitude_deg and missing information in column associated_airport

Navaids: Incorrect information column latitude_deg, column longitude_deg and missing information in column associated_airport

Closed

I have 2 f40 yesterday. Then this morning i check 1 of the f40 missing

121.90 is for West Ground (Reported as "south ground")

125.35 is for East Ground (Reported as "north ground")

Pitt Meadows has an ICAO code of CYPK.

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitt_Meadows_Regional_Airport

ICAO code added.

Airport is a duplicate of CPJ5 Stirling, which is a registered aerodrome and has been in the OurAirports database since at least 2013.

My mistake. There really is a private aerodrome with a runway intersecting CPJ5 according to the CFS.

Hospital position on the map is no longer accurate as Grande Prairie has opened a new hospital.

Runway designators changed to 14/32.

Runway information updated.

Runway designators changed to 14/32.

Runway information updated.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Burned down in a wildfire, burned down along with the whole town, fire still raging in area, I’ll update later when it opens again

Operational again according to the CFS.

WAYYYY off from the actual airport…

Sorry but I’m a man of absolute PERFECTION

So you don’t have to fix it if you don’t want to

Location fixed by user.

Nav aids for CYYT have been decommissioned. All NDB’s in vicinity have been made obsolete: Signal Hill (NL), Outer Cove (ZYT), Torbay (YT), and Wabana (ZNF)

NDBs removed from the database.

Run Way changes 30/12

Runway lights in operation

Length 3200

Runway info update by user.

CYQA has closed runway 09/27 grass runway. CYKZ has closed entirely. Do you keep this database up to date generally?

CYKZ was already marked as closed. I've done the same now for CYQA 09/27. This is a community-maintained database, so please feel free to log in and correct any issues you find.

AWOS NOTAM - New freq is 122.975

Adding to frequencies -- thanks for the report.

AWOS now available - telephone ONLY - 1-833-994-2634 - installed (early 2024)

There's no place to add this in the airport record, but I'm including it in a comment.

AWOS now on field - 122.175

Added AWOS. Thanks for the report.

Airport is Medium size not small. Compared to Owen sound CYOS with only one length of pavement, Kincardine has two which is runways 05 23 and 13 31.

"does OurAirports have a standard definition for the difference between local and regional airports?" nope, but since this change has been made, we're calling it a day :)

Love the site! Water Aerodrome is actually at the docks !

Corrected location, thank you!

https://d.docs.live.net/58e88cd23110285c/%d8%a7%d8%aa%d8%aa%d8%aa%d8%aa%d8%aa/compatibility_test_suite.docx

Airport exists.

Should be runways:

02/44

13/31

Runway headings are correct per Wikipedia and satellite view.

Airport was closed to public use in 2019

Now it’s privately owned by Paramount Resources

CFT9 has been closed.

permanent closure of runway 10-28 renamed into taxiway C. Link: https://iaac-aeic.gc.ca/050/evaluations/proj/84624

Runway has been closed.

Runway 02-20 does not exist anymore. It has been changed to Taxiway Mike. Please see latest CAP/CFS from NAV CANADA.

Runway 02/20 has been closed.

The marker is not centred on the actual airport

Moved marker to runway.

IATA code is missing (YHG)

IATA LID has been added.

Same fate as the last one, burned down in a fire along with the whole town, all residents were evacuated, everything in Fox Lake is gone

That's very sad about the fire. There is no NOTAM listing the landing surface as closed, but it is listed as restricted due to the fire. Presumably it is still available to frontline responders if needed?

Closed since 2016

Still listed in the Canada Flight Supplement as of 2023-06-04, and grass strip appears stll to be maintained in recent satellite imagery.

Should be 50.07137, -124.98362

Moved marker to water.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huntsville/Deerhurst_Resort_Airport reports airport is closed. It is also no longer in the CFS

I've marked the airport as closed.

Slightly odd name choice in use of \ not / in the name. Care to ask the airport if they'd like to switch the angle of their slash?

Why? Well somewhat comically, when used in C/C++ software, the compiler baulks at \O being an invalid 'escape sequence'.

It's easily fixed in software, by changing the \ to a \\ to make the slash 'literal'.

But just thought I'd mention, as this airport is the only one worldwide that has \ not /

name updated

Burnaby is located on Burnaby Rd, not in a farmers field shown here.

remnants of the former runway are still visible in satellite imagery

CSH5 is duplicated in twice your database.

REF: 1522, IDENT: CSH5, NAME: St-Ferdinand Airport

REF: 311164, IDENT: CSH5, NAME: Lac William, Piste de glace (hiver seulement)

All duplicate GPS and IATI codes resolved