Canada airport problem reports

Name: Fogo Aerodrome

The actual airstrip is north and west of the marker.

The METAR you report is from an airport 220 km away. Nav Canada has an aviation weather system on site which is publicly reported. Historical you reported correctly, this is a recent change. I am Operations Manager for this aerodrome.

This website doesn't report weather. You've probably been directed here by a website or app that uses this website's airport database, but you should direct your METAR issue to them.

The game is letting me in same room again and again. Pleaae fix the bug.

This is a spam report.

Why are your planes circling in my residential neighbourhood in brantford by the grand river off hardy rd. disturbing our peace.Stay where u are! C FJUB. TELL THEM TO LEAVE US ALONE.

Not actually a problem with the data in this database.

Good day. Every single airport in Canada, uses MAGNETIC not TRUE headings, you are incorrectly reporting every single runway at every single airport in Canada. I have copies of NAV Canada's publications of the runway at CYYT, I can forward them when I receive the response email.

Runway 10/28 for example at my airport CYYT (102°/282° MAG as per the legal published areodrome charts) is being shown as 086°/266° TRUE. I use to use the METAR/TAF decoder website/app that is using your information to help me see what way the winds were blowing across the runway at the start of my shift so I could get a heads up to plan how I was plowing the runway with the winds. But due to the incorrect reporting of the runway, the winds will show it straight down the runway, when we have a cross wind for example.

Two thoughts:

1. Your aggressive opening statement is factually incorrect. Airports in northern domestic airspace have runways numbered and weather reported in degrees true.

2. As @Bill35 noted, the true headings of runways are much more reasonable to record as permanent information in a database, as magnetic headings will change and can be calculated with a current map of magnetic variation (but the runways themselves rarely move). If the developer of a weather app chose to use an open database and not read the documentation on the database (or apply the data correctly), that's their problem and not a reason to expect an open data project to maintain accurate and current magnetic data as the pole moves. A quick google search suggests there is an MIT-licensed Python library that implements the World Magnetic Model that could be used to calculate up to date magnetic headings from the true headings in the OurAirports database. Maybe you should direct this complaint to the developer of your decoder website and suggest they implement something like that.

No runwat frequency info. Oak Hammock has grass (18/36) and CTAF 122.8. BTW I am member and tried to edit runway and frequency multiple times without success. That part of the site seems broken.

@@IafFq

Indecipherable problem.

@@Fynx4

Indecipherable problem.

Can you explain why?

web address doesn't lead to the airport but some random blog. Here is the right link i found, https://www.oshawa.ca/business-development/oshawa-executive-airport/

@@8DtRO

20'"

@@H9beW

20'"

@@y1zg6

@@DMsRn

Thank you for putting the red lens on the light. The white light was bothering my cattle.

Airport new name "Grand River Executive". See up to date info in the Canada Flight Supplement.

Name has been changed.

There is no airport here

Not a Belleville problem, but the latest Google Chrome reports this site as dangerous and at risk for malicious hackers to exploit users because it is on "http" and not "https" which I believe is encrypted.

Removed from the current Transport Canada Flight Supplement (CFS)

Airfield has been closed.

Keywords: SB4, (Either no comma or additional information required after the comma)

Navaids: Incorrect information in column latitude_deg, column longitude_deg and missing information in column associated_airport

Navaids: Incorrect information column latitude_deg, column longitude_deg and missing information in column associated_airport

Closed

I have 2 f40 yesterday. Then this morning i check 1 of the f40 missing

121.90 is for West Ground (Reported as "south ground")

125.35 is for East Ground (Reported as "north ground")

Pitt Meadows has an ICAO code of CYPK.

References:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pitt_Meadows_Regional_Airport

ICAO code added.

Airport is a duplicate of CPJ5 Stirling, which is a registered aerodrome and has been in the OurAirports database since at least 2013.

My mistake. There really is a private aerodrome with a runway intersecting CPJ5 according to the CFS.

Hospital position on the map is no longer accurate as Grande Prairie has opened a new hospital.

Runway designators changed to 14/32.

Runway information updated.

Runway designators changed to 14/32.

Runway information updated.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Any possibility that the NOTAMs from CFPS can be implemented here?

Unfortunately, no. I used to include them, but Nav Canada explicitly asked me not to, so I stopped.

Burned down in a wildfire, burned down along with the whole town, fire still raging in area, I’ll update later when it opens again

Operational again according to the CFS.

WAYYYY off from the actual airport…

Sorry but I’m a man of absolute PERFECTION

So you don’t have to fix it if you don’t want to

Location fixed by user.

Nav aids for CYYT have been decommissioned. All NDB’s in vicinity have been made obsolete: Signal Hill (NL), Outer Cove (ZYT), Torbay (YT), and Wabana (ZNF)

NDBs removed from the database.

Run Way changes 30/12

Runway lights in operation

Length 3200

Runway info update by user.

CYQA has closed runway 09/27 grass runway. CYKZ has closed entirely. Do you keep this database up to date generally?

CYKZ was already marked as closed. I've done the same now for CYQA 09/27. This is a community-maintained database, so please feel free to log in and correct any issues you find.

AWOS NOTAM - New freq is 122.975

Adding to frequencies -- thanks for the report.

AWOS now available - telephone ONLY - 1-833-994-2634 - installed (early 2024)

There's no place to add this in the airport record, but I'm including it in a comment.

AWOS now on field - 122.175

Added AWOS. Thanks for the report.

Airport is Medium size not small. Compared to Owen sound CYOS with only one length of pavement, Kincardine has two which is runways 05 23 and 13 31.

"does OurAirports have a standard definition for the difference between local and regional airports?" nope, but since this change has been made, we're calling it a day :)