World airport problem reports

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Continent: Asia instead of Europe

Name. (Jungwon Air Boryeong Airfield)

Not the same location (Upper side of the Suyeong River, Very close)

Cremenari Airfield

There is no Camp Humphreys' IATA code in here, Which is KSG.

The IATA code

Hello,

The ICAO code has already been updated to SD9C, but the issue is not fully resolved.

The airport page is still using the old identifier in the URL:

https://ourairports.com/airports/SNFW/

Additionally, external services such as:

https://metar-taf.com/pt/airport/SNFW-sao-joao-do-piaui-airport

are still displaying the outdated ICAO "SNFW" for this airport.

Hi! They closed simpang airport in 2018, and new city proposed to be built there

Appears that this is no longer in service/existance

This appears to be a modellers' field, no human-carrying flying. Do we really want to list it?

Comune di Premosello-Chiovenda

Comune di Premosello-Chiovenda

As stated in TRNC AIP LCIK AD 3

* ICAO location indicator is "LCIK"

* Type is heliport.

* Name is "Karter"

https://hizliresim.com/oz2fws9

The name should be Spanish Lookout Airport for some reason this has been called Manatee Airport in all online datasets, and none of the locals know why.

No runways are marked and weather information is available the runways at rufforth west are 17 35 to the north and south 23 05 to the east and west the radio frequency is 123.815 and the airport code is EGYJ Rufforth west is a gliding site operated by York Gliding Centre.

Just to add..... the radio frequency is called Rufforth traffic and the runway lengths are incorrect on the map Runway 23/05 measures 632 by 46 metres and Runway 17/35 measures 1200 by 46 metres the elevation is 65ft above sea level

This airport is not in Sumatra Selatan

the web address is wrong. It's https://ourairports.com/airports/MT40 but it needs to be https://ourairports.com/airports/MT49

Plan to reject this report, initial URL was correct. Web master may wish to change Ident: to MT49.

Subject: RJTT runway threshold discrepancies (AIP vs OurAirports)

RJTT AIP data vs OurAirports values do not match numerically

From the RJTT AIP:

RWY 16L threshold

Lat: 35 deg 33' 57.23" N

Lon: 139 deg 47' 11.59" E

From OurAirports:

16L Base Threshold

Lat: 35 deg 33' 57.24" N (very close)

Lon: 139 deg 47' 13.21" E (~1.62 arcsec off, approx 40 m)

This longitude difference is too large to be explained by rounding.

Reciprocal runway (34R) also shows inconsistency

RJTT AIP gives:

RWY 34R threshold

Lat: 35 deg 32' 22.90" N

Lon: 139 deg 48' 18.49" E

OurAirports shows:

Reciprocal Threshold (DER)

Lat: 35 deg 32' 33" N (~10.1 arcsec, approx 310 m difference)

Lon: 139 deg 48' 10.78" E (~7.7 arcsec, approx 190 m difference)

These are not small deviations and suggest a systematic issue.

Overall assessment

RWY 16L:

Latitude matches closely

Longitude shows a significant offset (~40 m)

RWY 34R:

Both latitude and longitude show large positional differences (~200-300 m)

I updated all runway threshold and displacements based on more precise Bing maps and Google maps coordinates.

Line | Status | Source | le_ident | le_latitude_deg | le_longitude_deg | le_displaced_threshold_ft

-------|-----------|---------------|----------|------------------|------------------|---------------------------

32208 | Incorrect | Our Airports | 16L | 35.565899 | 139.787009 |

32208 | Correct | RJTT AIP | 16L | 35.56589722 | 139.78655278 | 1280

I updated all runway coordinates and displacements to the best of my knowledge. The coordinates cited from RJTT AIP define the runway endpoints but not the threshold.

Should be a medium airport, not large.

For SBDO there's a METAR for this ICAO, however the metar-taf is using either SBCG or SBPP instead.

You may get more official METAR information from Brazil's National Civil Aviation Agency (ANAC) on the following website used by real pilots

https://redemet.decea.mil.br

Runways are 08-26

Magnetic of the Runway is 12-30

Plan to reject this report. OurAirports sat. imagery is old. Mag hdgs 13/31 per new imagery.

This airport is exported as `K1B9`, but the `K` designation, from my understanding, is only for assigned airports in the US. So this airport should not have an ID exported as 'K1B9`.

ANG OPS shows as a HF frequency. Should be 234.65MHz AM.

iso_region: IT-23 instead of IT-U-A