World airport problem reports

Continent should be EU instead of AS

Continent should be EU instead of AS

Continent should be SA instead of NA

LECU shows the Metar information from LEGT, a close by airport but with different metar. The correct weather / metar information should be from LEVS with is the military runway located at LECU. This difference affect because some times as an example, LEGT may show IFR conditions but LEVS / LECU have VFR conditions. This can be confusing, LECU is open for VFR but shows IFR.

Continent should be EU instead of AS

LECU shows the Metar information from LEGT, a close by airport but with different metar. The correct weather / metar information should be from LEVS with is the military runway located at LECU. This difference affect because some times as an example, LEGT may show IFR conditions but LEVS / LECU have VFR conditions. This can be confusing, LECU is open for VFR but shows IFR.

There is no longer an airbase here it has moved

@@Fn7uw

@@kh04h

@@f1fRE

@@O9w4g

@@UzUdN

@@kfzZd

20'"

@@VxSLO

@@tGSiP

@@IbZRd

There is a new runway here.

There is a new runway here.

there is a runway listed in the runways.csv listed as H1

@@1owCJ

20'"

@@HSCTL

@@GpuEA

20'"

@@8ETL4

20'"

@@FuHdd

@@bgAro

https://hubud.kemenhub.go.id/hubud/website/bandara/212

In the map we can see the TWY D, but when we change satellite viwe we can see instead of TWY D ground marks A4 on holdshort RWY 17,so which one is correct?

I only see one runway in the satellite image, but both Wikipedia and this site indicate that there are three.

Airport now goes by ICAO code of HSSM

According to Wikipedia, the ICAO code is HSSM(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malakal_Airport). However, some sources still use HJMK.

The runway numbers and directions have changed. The correct runway numbers are 04 and 22

Good day. Every single airport in Canada, uses MAGNETIC not TRUE headings, you are incorrectly reporting every single runway at every single airport in Canada. I have copies of NAV Canada's publications of the runway at CYYT, I can forward them when I receive the response email.

Runway 10/28 for example at my airport CYYT (102°/282° MAG as per the legal published areodrome charts) is being shown as 086°/266° TRUE. I use to use the METAR/TAF decoder website/app that is using your information to help me see what way the winds were blowing across the runway at the start of my shift so I could get a heads up to plan how I was plowing the runway with the winds. But due to the incorrect reporting of the runway, the winds will show it straight down the runway, when we have a cross wind for example.

Please view the official NAV Canada Canadian airport charts. page 736 of 752 is CYYT showing runway 10/28 as 102°/282° not 086/266

https://www.navcanada.ca/en/cac20251127.pdf

this lists every single airport in canada. that is the official publication that I grabbed the #'s from back in October.

web address doesn't lead to the airport but some random blog. Here is the right link i found, https://www.oshawa.ca/business-development/oshawa-executive-airport/

Fix aerodrome elevation to 433 ft in accordance with AIP Perú

Fix aerodrome elevation to 433 ft in accordance with AIP Perú

Fix runway elevation to 487 ft in accordance with AIP Perú

@@pn7ak

20'"

@@M6tyG

20'"

@@ouHtT

20'"

@@k2tq5

20'"

@@8DtRO

20'"

@@H9beW